Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts
Saturday, April 16, 2016
Sunday, April 3, 2016
Video Roundup : April 2, 2016
Islam
"The Religion of Peace STRIKES AGAIN" by Naked Ape.Feminism
"MGTOW is Feminism For Men?" by Turd Flinging Monkey."Girl knows how guys think - helping ignorant men!" by Bearing.
"Mark Steyn: Sweden's male-female ratio is now more skewed than China's" by Rebel Media.
"News: Hypergamy Is Men's Fault?" by Turd Flinging Monkey.
"Ghomeshi Accusers Are Liars" by Feminism LOL.
Michelle Fields
"Michelle Fields Attacked by Leonardo DiCaprio Bodyguard - Almost Thrown to the Ground" by Mark Dice."Michelle Fields Falsely Accused Mark Dice of Harassment After Interview in 2012" by Mark Dice.
LGBT
"The Transgender: Normalizing MENTAL ILLNESS" by Black Pigeon Speaks.Free Speech
"Ontario Provincial Police contact writer over sarcastic, critical tweet" by Rebel Media."MTV Decoded HATES Free Speech!" by Chris Ray Gun.
Embedding was disabled for this video. Sorry.
"Another feminist is after your freedom of speech #2" by Bearing.
Racism
"Ben Shapiro Takes on Institutional Racism and White Privilege" by YAFTV."CULTURAL APPROPRIATION! - Whites Can't Have Dreadlocks" by Chris Ray Gun.
"Black Woman Assaults White Student for Having Dreadlocks, Saying It's "Cultural Appropriation"" by Mark Dice.
"#DearWhitePeople: You're Gonna Die!" by Undoomed.
Socialism
"BERNIE WILL RAISE YOUR TAXES" by Julie Borowski.MSM
"Globe & Mail devotes photo spread to Justin Trudeau's socks" by Rebel Media.Pedophilia
"The Politics of Child Molesting" by Wild Bill for America.Hypocrisy
"Alberta oil tycoon who urged NDP to raise taxes leaves Canada “for tax reasons”" by Rebel Media.Some Levity
"Gender Fluid Barbie" by Gary Orsum.NewsBusted

- Bearing 1 2
- Black Pigeon Speaks
- Chris Ray Gun 1 2
- Feminism LOL
- Gary Orsum
- Julie Borowski
- Mark Dice 1 2 3
- Naked Ape
- NewsBusted
- Rebel Media 1 2 3 5
- Turd Flinging Monkey 1 2
- Undoomed
- Wild Bill for America
- YAFTV
Thursday, March 17, 2016
Video Roundup : March 17, 2016
Corruption
"Multiple arrests of Liberals, PQs by Quebec’s anti-corruption unit" by Rebel Media.Government & Islam
'CONFIRMED: Millions spent on “Mosque built for no one” and army base renovations' by Rebel Media.Social Justice Warriors
'SJWs bring "consent" to St. Patrick’s Day — "ASK to kiss me, I’m Irish"?' by Rebel Media.Some Trump Levity
"Donald Trump is LITERALLY Hitler" by Paul Joseph Watson."Man Runs Over Trump Sign with Jeep" by Mark Dice.
Face Palm
Insanity unearthed by Rebel Media.Sunday, January 17, 2016
Thursday, October 1, 2015
If Stephen King wrote a Pat Condell Rant
Here is a Pat Condell rant:
Here is a Pat Condell rant if it was written by Stephen King (unnecessarily long):
Here is a Pat Condell rant if it was written by Stephen King (unnecessarily long):
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
Amusing Explanation through Bureaucratic Citation
I am pleasantly surprised that the press have reported that a middle-eastern airline, Kuwait Airways, has been called out by the Department of Transportation for not servicing Israeli citizens.
However, DOT seems to have been pushed into doing this. In a letter to the airline company it is revealed at first DOT did not seem to see a problem with the discrimination till the complaint was petitioned for review to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Here is a snippet from the letter:
So... why was 49 U.S.C. § 41310 missed? Let's get really silly because a lot more was missed and cited in the letter. There were so many citations I just could not read the letter and make any sense of it.
Here are all the regulations/laws/court cases/etc. cited in the letter other than the original "49 U.S.C. §40127(a)" that was found to not be violated.
THAT! All of that was missed upon first review of a complaint that a Kuwaiti airline with operations in the U.S. would not sell any Israeli citizen a ticket. Ignored until the case could have gone to a U.S. Court of Appeals.
The scary thing is that whole mess of citations was missed when they didn't care. What citations can be found to pursue a case against anyone the government wants to go after?
How many B***S*** regulations/laws/etc. are out there waiting for a bureaucrat with nothing to do but looks up B***S*** stuff to mess with the citizenry?
The airlines discriminated. DOT was lazy and didn't do its job until it was almost embarrassed and then it found heaps of reasons to go after the airline.
When an agency isn't lazy, they have heaps of reasons to come after you.
However, DOT seems to have been pushed into doing this. In a letter to the airline company it is revealed at first DOT did not seem to see a problem with the discrimination till the complaint was petitioned for review to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. Here is a snippet from the letter:
Mr. Gatt’s complaint alleged that KAC discriminated against him, an Israeli citizen traveling on an Israeli passport, in violation of 49 U.S.C. §40127(a) by preventing him from purchasing a ticket for travel on KAC from John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) to London Heathrow Airport (LHR). Upon notice of our initial decision finding no unlawful discrimination in this matter, Mr. Gatt filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. We subsequently reopened our investigation and reconsidered the matter anew. As part of our reconsideration, we considered Mr. Gatt’s claim upon an alternative ground, i.e. 49 U.S.C. § 41310, which holds that, “[a]n air carrier or foreign air carrier may not subject a person, place, port, or type of traffic in foreign air transportation to unreasonable discrimination.” After a thorough review of the information provided by the parties, we find that KAC unreasonably discriminated against Mr. Gatt in violation of 49 U.S.C. § 41310 by refusing to sell him a ticket on its flight from JFK to LHR.
So... why was 49 U.S.C. § 41310 missed? Let's get really silly because a lot more was missed and cited in the letter. There were so many citations I just could not read the letter and make any sense of it.
Here are all the regulations/laws/court cases/etc. cited in the letter other than the original "49 U.S.C. §40127(a)" that was found to not be violated.
- 49 U.S.C. § 41310
- section 41310, formerly 49 U.S.C. § 1374(b)
- section 404(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958
- section 404(b) of the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938
- section 3 of the Interstate Commerce Act (ICA) of 1887
- Interstate Commerce Act of 1887, sec. 3, 24 Stat. 379, 380 (1887)
- Federal Aviation Act of 1958, Pub. L. No. 85-726, sec. 404(b), 72 Stat. 731, 760 (1958)
- Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938, Pub. L. No. 75-706, sec 404(b), 52 Stat. 973, 993 (1938)
- Pearson v. Duane, 71 U.S. 605, 615 (1866)
- Pittman v. Grayson, No. 93 Civ. 3974, 1997 WL 370331, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 1997) (finding that airlines are common carriers), aff’d, 149 F.3d 111, 123 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 818 (1999)
- Mitchell v. U.S., 313 U.S. 80 (1941)
- Fitzgerald v. Pan Am. World Airways, 229 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1956)
- 49 U.S.C. § 1374(b)
- 49 U.S.C. § 44902
- Williams v. Trans World Airlines, 509 F.2d 942 (2d Cir. 1975)
- 509 F.2d at 948 (holding T.W.A. acted reasonably in refusing passage to passenger who had been subject of F.B.I. warning)
- Cordero v. Cia Mexicana de Aviacion, S.A.
- 681 F.2d 669 (9th Cir.1982)
- Title 49 of the U.S. Code and the orders, rules and regulations of the Department of Transportation - Permit to Foreign Air Carrier, KAC Corporation, Order 2011-3-30, (March 24, 2011) Docket DOT-OST-2010-0246
- U.S. v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 333 U.S. 169, 175 (1948)
- Fitzgerald, 229 F.2d 499
- Sec. 3 of the U.S. Export Administration Act of 1979, Pub. L. 96-72, 93 Stat. 503
- 50 App. U.S.C. 2402(5)(A)
- 15 C.F.R. 760 (outlining Department of Commerce’s anti-boycott regulations)
- 15 CFR 760.2 (a) (1)
THAT! All of that was missed upon first review of a complaint that a Kuwaiti airline with operations in the U.S. would not sell any Israeli citizen a ticket. Ignored until the case could have gone to a U.S. Court of Appeals.
The scary thing is that whole mess of citations was missed when they didn't care. What citations can be found to pursue a case against anyone the government wants to go after?
How many B***S*** regulations/laws/etc. are out there waiting for a bureaucrat with nothing to do but looks up B***S*** stuff to mess with the citizenry?
The airlines discriminated. DOT was lazy and didn't do its job until it was almost embarrassed and then it found heaps of reasons to go after the airline.
When an agency isn't lazy, they have heaps of reasons to come after you.
Thursday, September 24, 2015
Syrian Refugee Petitions
The Middle East is a hot bed of Islamic terrorists and people that chant "Death to America!" Does this sound like a pool of people we want coming to America?
MoveOn.org thinks so.
MoveOn.org has a petition to accept more "refugees" from Syria and elsewhere. This is what the petition states:
That last line gets me. We have the wealth? Is MoveOn not aware of our debt, deficiet, and unemployment rate? Do they not know how many people are already on food stamps?
The crazy thing is they almost have the 75,000 signatures needed! But that is MoveOn's threshold.
So let us look at the White House's petition board.
Yup. There is a petition there too, but it needs a total of 100,000 signatures by Sept 30th and is about 12,000 away from the goal. It calls to resettle 65,000 refugees. This will only get a response from the White House, not legislation.
Could be worse, and it is! This petition wants to let in 140,000 refugees! It has an October 3rd deadline and is 99,000 signatures away.
This petition wants to allow the refugees to apply for citizenship after 1,000 days instead of 5 years.
Does anyone believe in protecting our interests?
YES!
This petition calls for blocking refugees from Syria and other Gulf states. It only has 365 of the needed 100,000 signatures with a deadline of October 12th.
Sign it now!
MoveOn.org thinks so.
MoveOn.org has a petition to accept more "refugees" from Syria and elsewhere. This is what the petition states:
There is a refugee crisis happening right now and the U.S. needs to show leadership and kindness by accepting these refugees from Syria and elsewhere. Germany is accepting 800,000 refugees while we are only accepting in the few thousands. We have the wealth to do it, so let's do it!
That last line gets me. We have the wealth? Is MoveOn not aware of our debt, deficiet, and unemployment rate? Do they not know how many people are already on food stamps?
The crazy thing is they almost have the 75,000 signatures needed! But that is MoveOn's threshold.
So let us look at the White House's petition board.
Yup. There is a petition there too, but it needs a total of 100,000 signatures by Sept 30th and is about 12,000 away from the goal. It calls to resettle 65,000 refugees. This will only get a response from the White House, not legislation.
Could be worse, and it is! This petition wants to let in 140,000 refugees! It has an October 3rd deadline and is 99,000 signatures away.
This petition wants to allow the refugees to apply for citizenship after 1,000 days instead of 5 years.
Does anyone believe in protecting our interests?
YES!
This petition calls for blocking refugees from Syria and other Gulf states. It only has 365 of the needed 100,000 signatures with a deadline of October 12th.
Sign it now!
Wednesday, July 29, 2015
Sending In The Problem To Solve The Problem?
Today's blog post from the Department of State is about a global partnership to combat violent extremism (terrorism). It is mostly a bunch of flowery language making assertions about the goals and idealism that are pretty much counter to observed behavior of the administration. I'm not going to comment on that because it is just talk.
However, there is noted in the post something that just makes my head hurt. Here is the nuttery:
There is radicalization happening in jails so they are sending imams to the jail. Really? Am I the only one that sees this might be a problem? Well it says that the program is successful. As of this writing I could not find references to this program so no stats on success. Maybe my search skills are not good enough because I could only find articles about imams being put in jail.
If you can find an article or study about the success of the program please post in the comments.
However, there is noted in the post something that just makes my head hurt. Here is the nuttery:
Third, we expanded where we focus our efforts -- from areas on the periphery of active conflicts to prisons in our own countries where inmates can be radicalized. In Italy, where this week’s conference gathers, the Ministry of Justice recently launched a program to have 15 imams and 40 cultural mediators work with prisoners. The initiative has been so successful, they are already looking to scale it up.
There is radicalization happening in jails so they are sending imams to the jail. Really? Am I the only one that sees this might be a problem? Well it says that the program is successful. As of this writing I could not find references to this program so no stats on success. Maybe my search skills are not good enough because I could only find articles about imams being put in jail.
If you can find an article or study about the success of the program please post in the comments.
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
Friday, September 26, 2014
ISOT, not ISIS or ISIL
ISIS means Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. ISIL means Islamic State of Iraq and Levant.
How about we just settle for ISOT : Islamic State Of Terrorism.
However, if you are properly rude you may prefer IBF : Islamic B**t F**k*rs.
What do you think?
How about we just settle for ISOT : Islamic State Of Terrorism.
However, if you are properly rude you may prefer IBF : Islamic B**t F**k*rs.
What do you think?
Monday, September 15, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





