Yeah! The government has finally cut some spending!
What have they cut?
Disposable plates and cutler!
I'm fine with this, but it is a bit silly. Most businesses consider these items a regular business expense. People eat at their desks sometimes so they can continue working. This is good for the company because they get more work out of their employees.
But if this saves us enough money so we can study shrimp on a treadmill, go for it!
Thursday, August 13, 2015
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Secretary of Labor's Rose Colored Glasses
Well, the Secretary of Labor, Tom Perez, has put out a blog post calling on workers to form unions.
Tom cheers that we are in a great economic recovery but laments that wages are not up. He cites that union workers make about $200 more a week and so more people should form unions.
Of course there is no way that the ACA (Obamacare) has nothing to do with wages. Forcing employers to spend more money on employees or cut back on their hours to avoid this has absolutely nothing to do with wages. No. Not being in a union is to blame for low wages.
And yet, later in his blog post he writes:
What is it Mr. Secretary? Do we need unions or are companies getting competitive by offering their employees more?
Let us not forget how well the unions have worked out for Chrysler and GM. Plus how unions have bankrupted cities.
But no. With all the bankruptcy that unions cause let us go ahead and promote them. There is plenty of bailout money. Maybe that extra $200 a week people will make can be used in bailouts to keep the businesses open so that they can pay an extra $200 a week.
Perez has a small distorted vision on wages and does not take into account of what the government has thrust upon businesses through regulations and laws, nor has he examined how unions have hurt businesses.
There is no economic growth unless you make the environment friendly to make a profit. The smaller a company's profits get, the smaller the salaries, hours, and size of the work force.
Tom cheers that we are in a great economic recovery but laments that wages are not up. He cites that union workers make about $200 more a week and so more people should form unions.
Of course there is no way that the ACA (Obamacare) has nothing to do with wages. Forcing employers to spend more money on employees or cut back on their hours to avoid this has absolutely nothing to do with wages. No. Not being in a union is to blame for low wages.
And yet, later in his blog post he writes:
At the same time, employers are recognizing the benefits of empowering their employees to build successful, profitable businesses founded on middle-class jobs. Across the country, we’ve seen company after company raise their minimum wage, offer sick and parental leave, and commit to fairer scheduling practices.
What is it Mr. Secretary? Do we need unions or are companies getting competitive by offering their employees more?
Let us not forget how well the unions have worked out for Chrysler and GM. Plus how unions have bankrupted cities.
But no. With all the bankruptcy that unions cause let us go ahead and promote them. There is plenty of bailout money. Maybe that extra $200 a week people will make can be used in bailouts to keep the businesses open so that they can pay an extra $200 a week.
Perez has a small distorted vision on wages and does not take into account of what the government has thrust upon businesses through regulations and laws, nor has he examined how unions have hurt businesses.
There is no economic growth unless you make the environment friendly to make a profit. The smaller a company's profits get, the smaller the salaries, hours, and size of the work force.
Alleging Pay Gap
The Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs found that Savannah River Nuclear Solutions discriminated against female and black employees in pay from 2009 through 2010. The company denies this but has a conciliatory agreement to compensate these employees.
This sounds like one of those situations where it is cheaper to settle out of court. The settlement is for $235,000 across 72 employees. That is only $3263.89 per employee. Considering these are STEM jobs and probably pay well this discrepancy is probably fairly small percentage wise and easy to not notice.
In addition the article mentions the company had a $2.5 billion contract in 2009. That makes this amount incredibly small in terms of bookkeeping.
Breaking down these numbers start to look statistically insignificant. This is looking like the government trying to force exactly equal outcomes and assuming small discrepancies are discrimination.
Please note that the article does not give any indication of the incomes of any of the employees or their job specifications other than being STEM jobs. I can only assume the STEM job is fairly decent pay perhaps above $70,000 a year.
This sounds like one of those situations where it is cheaper to settle out of court. The settlement is for $235,000 across 72 employees. That is only $3263.89 per employee. Considering these are STEM jobs and probably pay well this discrepancy is probably fairly small percentage wise and easy to not notice.
In addition the article mentions the company had a $2.5 billion contract in 2009. That makes this amount incredibly small in terms of bookkeeping.
Breaking down these numbers start to look statistically insignificant. This is looking like the government trying to force exactly equal outcomes and assuming small discrepancies are discrimination.
Please note that the article does not give any indication of the incomes of any of the employees or their job specifications other than being STEM jobs. I can only assume the STEM job is fairly decent pay perhaps above $70,000 a year.
Escape from California
It is so depressing when fictional dystopian movies come close to being real life.
So far a majority of driver's licenses issued by California went to illegal aliens. 443,000 of 883,000 licenses by the end of July in 2015 went to illegal aliens.
Maybe we should build a fence around California and change California from a state to a jail or loony bin like "Escape from LA" and "Escape from New York." It is driving out all sorts of businesses due to its tax policies, but is taking in all sorts of illegal aliens. How long till Americans are the minority in California?
Maybe we just kick California out of the union and give it to Mexico. There you go Mexico. Pay for those Californian entitlements.
Best thing might be to strip California of its laws and make it a territory of Texas subject to Texan law. YeeHA!
So far a majority of driver's licenses issued by California went to illegal aliens. 443,000 of 883,000 licenses by the end of July in 2015 went to illegal aliens.
Maybe we should build a fence around California and change California from a state to a jail or loony bin like "Escape from LA" and "Escape from New York." It is driving out all sorts of businesses due to its tax policies, but is taking in all sorts of illegal aliens. How long till Americans are the minority in California?
Maybe we just kick California out of the union and give it to Mexico. There you go Mexico. Pay for those Californian entitlements.
Best thing might be to strip California of its laws and make it a territory of Texas subject to Texan law. YeeHA!
Tuesday, August 11, 2015
More Politics in Science
The "climate change" hysterics infection of science is abhorrent. It is not the only politicization in science.
The Minority Business Development Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer have partnered to fund minority businesses in the science field.
I don't think the government should be funding businesses period. A business should stand on its own success, not propped up by government.
What is more disturbing about this program is the government is going to fund high-tech companies not based on its merits but the color of the people in the company. That is a piss poor way to fund science.
The article laments that minority owned high-tech businesses are a minority in that field. So the government needs to step in to help them make up more of the market share because, I don't know, diversity makes for better science?
What are the chances that funding technology in this manner they will actually fund something important? This program admittedly ignores most tech companies because a majority of them are not minority businesses.
Can you hear it? Whoosh! Tax dollars being flushed down the toilet.
The Minority Business Development Agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer have partnered to fund minority businesses in the science field.
I don't think the government should be funding businesses period. A business should stand on its own success, not propped up by government.
What is more disturbing about this program is the government is going to fund high-tech companies not based on its merits but the color of the people in the company. That is a piss poor way to fund science.
The article laments that minority owned high-tech businesses are a minority in that field. So the government needs to step in to help them make up more of the market share because, I don't know, diversity makes for better science?
What are the chances that funding technology in this manner they will actually fund something important? This program admittedly ignores most tech companies because a majority of them are not minority businesses.
Can you hear it? Whoosh! Tax dollars being flushed down the toilet.
Money for Energy from the Department of ... Agriculture?
The redundancy in government is mind blowing. You would think loans and grants for energy come from the Department of Energy. Well, some do.
But why is the Department of Agriculture "investing" $63 million to support 264 energy projects? To promote American energy independence. Sure sounds like something that the Department of Energy should be doing.
In addition small business in rural areas are eligible. It appears that the business might not have to have anything to do with agriculture. Suddenly it seems that this program is also venturing into the territory of the Department of Commerce.
I do have to say that I am also a bit amused that these grants and loans can be used for geothermal energy production. Give me some money so I can drill through the mantel and harvest the awesome power of liquid magma!
But why is the Department of Agriculture "investing" $63 million to support 264 energy projects? To promote American energy independence. Sure sounds like something that the Department of Energy should be doing.
In addition small business in rural areas are eligible. It appears that the business might not have to have anything to do with agriculture. Suddenly it seems that this program is also venturing into the territory of the Department of Commerce.
I do have to say that I am also a bit amused that these grants and loans can be used for geothermal energy production. Give me some money so I can drill through the mantel and harvest the awesome power of liquid magma!
Friday, August 7, 2015
Government Force on Children
You will do as you are told or there will be consequences.
Children that are 8 or 9 years old do not fit in handcuffs. So how do you put handcuffs on a child? Put their arms behind them and use the handcuffs above the elbow.
What could cause a child so young to be treated as such?
Obey the state or suffer the consequences.
Children that are 8 or 9 years old do not fit in handcuffs. So how do you put handcuffs on a child? Put their arms behind them and use the handcuffs above the elbow.
What could cause a child so young to be treated as such?
- Screaming in class
- Trying to leave an isolation room
- Not doing as you're told
Obey the state or suffer the consequences.
More Climate Change : the Other Side of the Argument
Even after this presentation one of the politicians still argues that since there are so many scientists that think climate change is a problem caused by man it must be true. He went into this with a closed mind.
Subscribe to 1000frolly's YouTube channel!
Subscribe to 1000frolly's YouTube channel!
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
Burt Rutan on Global Warming
Bad-ass aerospace engineer Burt Rutan goes over his research into the data of global warming/climate change. Awesome presentation of the good of increased CO2 and destroying the consensus myth.
I support the police but...
The stupidity is incredible. Just incredible.
Here is the set of information that the Court and the police had:
A U.S. Circuit Judge recommended waiting a day or two to get a better understanding of whom was responsible.
What happened next?
The day after the court's recommendation the police sent in an 11 man SWAT team knocking down a door and throwing two flash bang grenades through an open window at, guess who's house? That right. The 68 year old woman's house.
The 68 year old woman and her 18 year old daughter, yes, the story says 18 year old daughter, were put in handcuffs and interrogated. After it was obvious they were not involved they were released.
What happened next?
The next day the police asked the other suspect, yes, asked, to come in for questioning.
The police justified the first assault because they thought there might be someone armed and dangerous inside the home.
Seriously. WTF?
Here is the set of information that the Court and the police had:
- The police were receiving online threats coming from a specific IP address
- The IP address belongs to a 68 year old woman's wifi network
- The woman's wifi network is unprotected
- Two houses down from the woman is a man with a history of making threats against the police
A U.S. Circuit Judge recommended waiting a day or two to get a better understanding of whom was responsible.
What happened next?
The day after the court's recommendation the police sent in an 11 man SWAT team knocking down a door and throwing two flash bang grenades through an open window at, guess who's house? That right. The 68 year old woman's house.
The 68 year old woman and her 18 year old daughter, yes, the story says 18 year old daughter, were put in handcuffs and interrogated. After it was obvious they were not involved they were released.
What happened next?
The next day the police asked the other suspect, yes, asked, to come in for questioning.
The police justified the first assault because they thought there might be someone armed and dangerous inside the home.
Seriously. WTF?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










